Skip to content

Optional ignore missing resources #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Optional ignore missing resources #67

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jmatthiesen81
Copy link

@jmatthiesen81 jmatthiesen81 commented Mar 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This pull request introduces the following changes:

  • New Feature: Added a new XML attribute ignoreMissing (boolean, optional) to improve configurability.
  • Enhancement: Implemented FileBasedStorageAvailableTrait, which provides a method to check the availability of file-based storage using storageAvailable(string $dsn).
  • Refactoring: Applied the new trait in relevant places to ensure missing files are properly ignored when ignoreMissing is set.

These changes improve file storage handling, prevent errors caused by missing files, and enhance overall code maintainability.

@jmatthiesen81 jmatthiesen81 force-pushed the feature/optional-ignore-missing-resources branch from 2989af8 to 30458e9 Compare March 13, 2025 15:04
@jmatthiesen81 jmatthiesen81 marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2025 17:06
@jmatthiesen81 jmatthiesen81 force-pushed the feature/optional-ignore-missing-resources branch from 30458e9 to aeb4321 Compare March 13, 2025 17:07
@jmatthiesen81 jmatthiesen81 changed the title WIP: Optional ignore missing resources Optional ignore missing resources Mar 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@jmatthiesen81