[iceberg-rest-fixture] fix sqlite error under high concurrent load #13367
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #13366
Use file-based sqlite db (i.e.
jdbc:sqlite:/tmp/iceberg_catalog.db
) instead of in-memory sqlite db (jdbc:sqlite:memory:
)File-based sqlite db allows for concurrent access with multiple jdbc connections. By contrast, in-memory sqlite db creates a new db per jdbc connection. Even with shared caching enabled (
jdbc:sqlite:file::memory:?cache=shared
), in-memory sqlite db can perform concurrent reads but concurrent writes will have race conditions and fail a subset of the requests.Test
Tested locally by explicitly overriding the env parameters in pyiceberg's integration test setup
and then running the "Reproduce" code in #13366