Upgrades lua-lunitx to version 0.8.1

[aninda-al]

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

• The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
• The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
• Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
• Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
• Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
• All package sources are available
• cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
• LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
• All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
• sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
• Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
• Ready to merge

---

Summary

Upgrades lua-lunitx to version 0.8.1

Build/Dependency Information

The PR is a leaf PR which builds alone successfully

Change Log

• deleted: ../SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-lunit/lua-lunit.signatures.json
• deleted: ../SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-lunit/lua-lunit.spec
• new file: ../SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-lunitx/lua-lunitx.signatures.json
• new file: ../SPECS-EXTENDED/lua-lunitx/lua-lunitx.spec
• modified: ../cgmanifest.json
• modified: ../LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json
• modified: LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md

Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues

• NA

Links to CVEs

• NA

Test Methodology

• NA

[kgodara912]

Buddy build passes. LGTM with minor suggesion.

[kgodara912]

You may obsolete any version < 0.8.1-12? Also, instead of hard coding, we can put < %{version}-%{release}
like the line above it.

[aninda-al]

modified obsoletes comparison as suggested

[0xba1a]

@aninda-al There are many other files other than lua-lunitx are updated in this PR. Is it intended?

@kgodara912 Please review the PR once again as there are changes after your approval.

[aninda-al]

@0xba1a Those extra files were merged by mistake. This pkg is actually renamed and each time I update it, there merge conflict and looks like I messed up during resolving the merge conflicts.

[0xba1a]

@aninda-al Can you get reviewed by @kgodara912 once again for the new changes?

[kgodara912]

Buddy build. Once conflicts are resolved which will be most likely in license files, should be good to merge.

[0xba1a]

lua-lunit is not maintained anymore. lua-lunitx is an extended version of the original package. This is also very dormant without any updates in last 7 years. We keep it as it is a BR for lua-json. This package looks safe as it is being built regularly in each Fedora release and no active CVEs.