Skip to content

Upgrade: shapelib version to 1.6.1 #13816

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

archana25-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@archana25-ms archana25-ms commented May 16, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Upgrade: shapelib version to 1.6.1

Build/Dependency Information

Please build following package with shapelib:

  • proj
Change Log
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/shapelib/shapelib.signatures.json
  • SPECS-EXTENDED/shapelib/shapelib.spec
  • cgmanifest.json
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

@archana25-ms archana25-ms requested review from a team as code owners May 16, 2025 07:51
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels May 16, 2025
@archana25-ms archana25-ms force-pushed the topic_shapelib branch 2 times, most recently from c0086d9 to 9c96a15 Compare May 16, 2025 08:37
@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented May 23, 2025

@archana25-ms Please check the source-signature-check. And also, resolve the conflicts.
@mfrw Re-Requesting review to verify above changes.

@0xba1a 0xba1a requested a review from mfrw May 23, 2025 15:20
@archana25-ms archana25-ms force-pushed the topic_shapelib branch 2 times, most recently from 67f9858 to 35729f6 Compare May 26, 2025 09:08
@archana25-ms archana25-ms reopened this May 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants