Skip to content

[Low] patch elfutils for CVE-2025-1352 #13905

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025

Conversation

durgajagadeesh
Copy link
Contributor

@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh commented May 28, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary
Change Log
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Verified patches are applied

@durgajagadeesh durgajagadeesh requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2025 12:44
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels May 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test build failure link

Copy link
Member

@mfrw mfrw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Retriggered: link

@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

kgodara912 commented May 29, 2025

Patch matches with upstream reference. Buddy build succeeded. @durgajagadeesh, You are claiming that you have built toolchain, did you actually build it?
The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)

Retriggered: link

@mfrw, This trigger is buddy build local where sources are downloaded from upstream instead of blob-store.

@0xba1a 0xba1a requested review from 0xba1a and kgodara912 June 10, 2025 08:03
@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Jun 10, 2025

Patch matches with upstream reference. Buddy build succeeded. @durgajagadeesh, You are claiming that you have built toolchain, did you actually build it? The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)

Retriggered: link

@mfrw, This trigger is buddy build local where sources are downloaded from upstream instead of blob-store.

Waiting for full build as the toolchain package change.
Expecting @kgodara912 to verify that.

@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

kgodara912 commented Jun 16, 2025

Triggered toolchain build with the PR. Will update with results --> Toolchain is building fine with this change.

Copy link
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Build build is succeeded and toolchain is building fine. LGTM.

@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Jun 17, 2025

Discussed with @kgodara912 offline. Triggering a full-build based on that discussion.

@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

Full build

@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

Full build is also successfull except one [ARM64-2-OneBranch]-Dev-BuildRpms → for which package build is successful, but at the end

Configuring Azure CLI to install extensions and use mariner org
ERROR: Request to https://github.com/Azure/azure-devops-cli-extension/releases/download/20240514.1/azure_devops-1.0.1-py2.py3-none-any.whl failed with 500

which seems unrelated to this PR. LGTM.

@0xba1a 0xba1a merged commit cec561a into microsoft:3.0-dev Jun 23, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants