Skip to content

[emitter-framework] Initial skeleton for csharp emitter framework #7566

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

maorleger
Copy link
Member

@maorleger maorleger commented Jun 5, 2025

This PR introduces a very basic skeleton as we start to iterate on a C# emitter framework.

There are plenty of TODOs that we want to tackle next; however, it'd be good to have some incremental progress

@maorleger maorleger marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2025 19:34
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Jun 5, 2025

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 🛝 VSCode Extension

@maorleger maorleger force-pushed the csharp-emitter-framework branch 4 times, most recently from c9e0ce3 to 09d09fa Compare June 13, 2025 19:31
@maorleger maorleger force-pushed the csharp-emitter-framework branch from 09d09fa to cd10fe5 Compare June 13, 2025 19:34
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/microsoft/typespec/@typespec/emitter-framework@7566

commit: 07d50cd

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 13, 2025

All changed packages have been documented.

  • @typespec/emitter-framework
Show changes

@typespec/emitter-framework - feature ✏️

Add csharp support: class, enum

@maorleger maorleger added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 07ad5a5 Jun 16, 2025
26 checks passed
@maorleger maorleger deleted the csharp-emitter-framework branch June 16, 2025 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants