Skip to content

Compute instructions references when making request, show why attachment was added #251497

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

aeschli
Copy link
Contributor

@aeschli aeschli commented Jun 14, 2025

  • let the hover of automatically added instructions show why they were added
  • move all parsing of prompt file to when the chat is executed
  • added promptService.getPromptType
  • removed getMode
  • removed tree utils

@aeschli aeschli self-assigned this Jun 14, 2025
@aeschli aeschli enabled auto-merge (squash) June 14, 2025 17:37
@aeschli aeschli changed the title Compute intsructions references when making request, show why attachment was added Compute instructions references when making request, show why attachment was added Jun 14, 2025
@vs-code-engineering vs-code-engineering bot added this to the June 2025 milestone Jun 14, 2025
@lszomoru
Copy link
Member

@aeschli, PR build is 🔴

@aeschli aeschli merged commit a1d87f0 into main Jun 16, 2025
8 checks passed
@aeschli aeschli deleted the aeschli/conceptual-hornet branch June 16, 2025 07:19
Subham-KRLX pushed a commit to Subham-KRLX/vscode that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
…ent was added (microsoft#251497)

* Compute intsructions references when making request, show why attachment was added

* remove unused getMetadata
Subham-KRLX pushed a commit to Subham-KRLX/vscode that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
…ent was added (microsoft#251497)

* Compute intsructions references when making request, show why attachment was added

* remove unused getMetadata
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants