ktsu.blastmerge v1.0.11

[matt-edmondson]

Checklist for Pull Requests

• Have you signed the Contributor License Agreement?
• Is there a linked Issue?

Manifests

• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same manifest update/change?
• This PR only modifies one (1) manifest
• Have you validated your manifest locally with winget validate --manifest <path>?
• Have you tested your manifest locally with winget install --manifest <path>?
• Does your manifest conform to the 1.10 schema?

Note: <path> is the directory's name containing the manifest you're submitting.

---

#262068

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[wingetbot]

   

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-61-262069-20250531-1

[stephengillie]

Automatic Validation ended with:

Executable C:\Users\validator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Packages\ktsu.BlastMerge__DefaultSource\ktsu.BlastMerge.ConsoleApp.exe returned exit code: -532462766 Executable C:\Users\validator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\blastmerge.exe returned exit code: -532462766

Hex	Dec	Inverted Dec	Symbol	Description
E0434352	-532462766	3762504530	EXCEPTION_COMPLUS	Unhandled Exception

(Automated response - build 1061.)

[Dvd-Znf]

There is no need to remove the metadata/yaml language server comments

[Dvd-Znf]

#262068

FYI: If you want to link a PR to an issue you need to prepend the issue id with a valid keyword in the PR's description
(Eg. Resolves #262068 instead of just #262068)

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-61-262069-20250531-2

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-61-262069-20250531-3

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-61-262069-20250531-4

[matt-edmondson]

Manual Validation ended with:
80070003 -2147024893 2147942403 COR_E_DIRECTORYNOTFOUND The specified path couldn't be found - ALLUSERSPROFILE Microsoft network dir doesn't exist

Attempted fix in HistoryInput.cs: ktsu-dev/BlastMerge@62289c0#diff-e05ca5db961f61bd2ea10956147d1b97935e4ec8f57e0ece7bdaca55c4a08401

Manual Validation ended with:

PS C:\Users\User\Desktop> C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\blastmerge.exe --version
CLR: Assert failure(PID 2672 [0x00000a70], Thread: 9064 [0x2368]): !AreShadowStacksEnabled() || UseSpecialUserModeApc()

Attempted fix in Program.cs: ktsu-dev/BlastMerge@62289c0#diff-e05ca5db961f61bd2ea10956147d1b97935e4ec8f57e0ece7bdaca55c4a08401

Tested with SandboxTest.ps1.

[matt-edmondson]

Fixes "attempted" because I am unable to reproduce in both development and sandbox environment.

[Dragon1573]

Hi @matt-edmondson, 👋🏼

Tip

It's recommended linking this PR to the issue using "close keywords".

Take care of those keywords because they're ONLY valid in your commit messages or PR descriptions. Editing your description is required. ❤️

[stephengillie]

Manual Validation ended with:

PS C:\Users\User\Desktop> C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\blastmerge.exe --version
CLR: Assert failure(PID 4432 [0x00001150], Thread: 4940 [0x134c]): !AreShadowStacksEnabled() || UseSpecialUserModeApc()
File: D:\a_work\1\s\src\coreclr\vm\threads.cpp:7938 Image:
C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\blastmerge.exe
PS C:\Users\User\Desktop>

(Automated response - build 1061.)

Edit:
Hi @matt-edmondson,

Manual Validation ended with:

PS C:\Users\User\Desktop> C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\blastmerge.exe --version
CLR: Assert failure(PID 2672 [0x00000a70], Thread: 9064 [0x2368]): !AreShadowStacksEnabled() || UseSpecialUserModeApc()

Attempted fix in Program.cs: ktsu-dev/BlastMerge@62289c0#diff-e05ca5db961f61bd2ea10956147d1b97935e4ec8f57e0ece7bdaca55c4a08401

Does this package happen to use a .NET 9.0 framework/runtime? The message AreShadowStacksEnabled() appeared in another PR, related to that dependency.

Tested with SandboxTest.ps1.

I'm testing these in a Hyper-V VM downloaded with Quick Create. I believe the sandbox might leverage the host OS frameworks and runtimes, but I'm not sure. (I don't actually have the sandbox set up on my laptop, and instead run everything through my VM automation amd orchestration system.)

[ItzLevvie]

@wingetbot run

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-63-262069-20250604-1

[matt-edmondson]

Does this package happen to use a .NET 9.0 framework/runtime? The message AreShadowStacksEnabled() appeared in another PR, related to that dependency.

Yes it uses .NET 9. is there anything the other application had to change, or is it a validation issue?

[stephengillie]

Does this package happen to use a .NET 9.0 framework/runtime? The message AreShadowStacksEnabled() appeared in another PR, related to that dependency.

Yes it uses .NET 9. is there anything the other application had to change, or is it a validation issue?

Apologies - I didn't notice that it's already listed as a dependency. Are you seeing this error locally? If not, it might be an artifact of the validation environment.

[matt-edmondson]

Apologies - I didn't notice that it's already listed as a dependency. Are you seeing this error locally? If not, it might be an artifact of the validation environment.

@stephengillie I havent seen this error in my testing in my dev environment, my spare pcs, or windows sandbox.

[wingetbot]

Publish pipeline succeeded for this Pull Request. Once you refresh your index, this change should be present.