-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
Add Mkdocs Spellcheck Linter #312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@robscott does the gateway api repo use any linters for mkdocs content? |
Sadly not, but we probably should try that out. |
/assign @artberger |
@danehans: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: artberger. Note that only kubernetes-sigs members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Here's a link to my fork’s changes of what the There is also another linter called Vale that I use for other doc projects. It is a little different than mkdocs, as it would be a GitHub Action that could run per-PR instead of in the build process. I could also set that up in my fork if you'd be interested in seeing what that looks like. |
Thanks @artberger for taking on this issue. I lean towards mkdocs since it provides consistency with the Gateway API project. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Several issues/PRs have been filed due to misspellings in docs site content. A spellcheck linter should be added to mkdocs. See https://pawamoy.github.io/mkdocs-spellcheck/ as a potential candidate and implementation details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: