Skip to content

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico commented Feb 27, 2025

Closes #1692.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.26%. Comparing base (ae4046e) to head (0d90880).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
R/make_linter_from_regex.R 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2801      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.64%   99.26%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files         127      127              
  Lines        7094     7094              
==========================================
- Hits         7069     7042      -27     
- Misses         25       52      +27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico changed the title Remove internal API test (make_linter_from_regex) Remove some tests of internal API Feb 27, 2025
@MichaelChirico

This comment was marked as outdated.

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 05:54
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico requested a review from Bisaloo June 27, 2025 18:57
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico requested a review from AshesITR July 13, 2025 06:18
@AshesITR AshesITR merged commit 81c58d6 into main Jul 13, 2025
20 checks passed
@AshesITR AshesITR deleted the rm-make-linter-test branch July 13, 2025 06:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use public interface in tests wherever possible (don't use :::)
2 participants