You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The section on sysid details kS, kV, and kA... but the differential drive simulator only deals with kV and kA and completely ignores kS. I found that the behavior in simulation was close, but still noticably different from Real Life until I accounted for kS.
The dumb-simple way I integrated kS (linear only) was with the following:
I haven't done anything rigorous yet like I did for the drivetrain K_v/K_a sysid model, but the threshold is probably some kind of weighted average between K_s,linear if V_l = V_r and K_s,angular if V_l = -V_r.
The section on sysid details kS, kV, and kA... but the differential drive simulator only deals with kV and kA and completely ignores kS. I found that the behavior in simulation was close, but still noticably different from Real Life until I accounted for kS.
The dumb-simple way I integrated kS (linear only) was with the following:
Once I added that.. the robot movement was much closer to what I expected. I suspect it's not quite right though.
It's possible that one result of this documentation request might end up as an addition to the simulation classes in addition to the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: