Replies: 1 comment
-
We try to omit extraneous type information wherever possible to keep dumps compact, but I agree the generics sometimes help. Here, though, we can see that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the bug
When trying to dump a generic type, the generic information is not included in the dump
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Expecting the generic type information to be included in the dump i.e.
DumpTests.Box<String>(value: \"test\")
Environment
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions