Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: u-boot cache version is wrong for fx-blox rk1 #7899

Open
1 of 2 tasks
mahdichi opened this issue Mar 2, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

[Bug]: u-boot cache version is wrong for fx-blox rk1 #7899

mahdichi opened this issue Mar 2, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug Something isn't working as it should

Comments

@mahdichi
Copy link
Contributor

mahdichi commented Mar 2, 2025

What happened?

I want to build Armbian V25.02 for FxBlox RK1 board but it seems the u-boot artifact is old
here's the build log

artifact [ uboot :: uboot() ]
[🌱] Producing new & caching [ GIT_INFO_UBOOT ]
[🌱] Fetching SHA1 of 'branch' 'refs/heads/next-dev-v2024.10' [ https://github.com/radxa/u-boot.git ]
[🌱] SHA1 of branch refs/heads/next-dev-v2024.10 [ 'baac584011842f7f141d7828e311b3e098f3472e' ]
[🌱] Found cached git version [ 6f94da945f65dcddc740b514e709a620944e4389 ]
[🌱] Getting ORAS manifest [ ORAS manifest from ghcr.io/armbian/os/uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor:2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a ]
[🌱] Artifact is available in remote cache [ ghcr.io/armbian/os/uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor:2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a - 'uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor - 2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a - version "2017.09" git revision "6f94da945f65dcddc740b514e709a620944e4389" patches hash "fe5f309dcfe0b0e9" Extension hooks hash "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b" uboot functions hash "451362ceb4598378ce7ddf421de083face7a2f1eb7c717294aebaafa7cae6fa1" variables hash "db8dec9e3029a73ac95338eabd11730e2910e815279b2781c99312b21298601b" framework bash hash "b7035b95c8004ab0" - type: deb' ]
[🌱] Obtaining artifact from remote cache [ ghcr.io/armbian/os/uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor:2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a into linux-u-boot-fxblox-rk1-vendor_2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a_arm64.deb ]
✓ Pulled linux-u-boot-fxblox-rk1-vendor_2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a_arm64.deb 1.05/1.05 MB 100.00% 491ms
└─ sha256:d6f0b828ee19ac0b81d21015ac33dba762358bff7c988148878d2604904f19ce
✓ Pulled application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json 1.18/1.18 kB 100.00% 0s
└─ sha256:0fec7e8fe4a5bbbd1c40fd1680d34ab379dd2835a2c6d872f59b2dc1fc7751d0
[🔨] Pulled [registry] ghcr.io/armbian/os/uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor:2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a
[🔨] Digest: sha256:0fec7e8fe4a5bbbd1c40fd1680d34ab379dd2835a2c6d872f59b2dc1fc7751d0
[💖] artifact [ obtained from remote cache: uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor 2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a ]
[🌱] Reversioning package [ re-version 'uboot-fxblox-rk1-vendor(deb)::2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a' to '25.2.1' ]
[🔨] removed '/mnt/sdb1/armbian/build/output/packages-hashed/global/linux-u-boot-fxblox-rk1-vendor_2017.09-S6f94-Pfe5f-Hd0b5-Vdb8d-Bb703-R448a_arm64.deb'

How to reproduce?

./compile.sh build BOARD=fxblox-rk1 BRANCH=vendor BUILD_DESKTOP=yes CLEAN_LEVEL=oldcache,make-uboot DESKTOP_APPGROUPS_SELECTED='3dsupport browsers chat desktop_tools editors email internet multimedia office remote_desktop' DESKTOP_ENVIRONMENT=gnome DESKTOP_ENVIRONMENT_CONFIG_NAME=config_base ENABLE_EXTENSIONS=mesa-vpu EXPERT=yes KERNEL_BTF=no KERNEL_CONFIGURE=no RELEASE=noble SHARE_LOG=yes

Branch

other (only relevant in corner cases)

On which host OS are you running the build script and observing this problem?

Ubuntu 22.04 Jammy

Are you building on Windows WSL2?

  • Yes, my Ubuntu/Debian/OtherOS is running on WSL2

Relevant log URL

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@mahdichi mahdichi added the Bug Something isn't working as it should label Mar 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Jira ticket: AR-2623

@EvilOlaf
Copy link
Member

EvilOlaf commented Mar 2, 2025

Tried ARTIFACT_IGNORE_CACHE=yes to force rebuild?

@mahdichi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mahdichi commented Mar 2, 2025

Tried ARTIFACT_IGNORE_CACHE=yes to force rebuild?

I will try this. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working as it should
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants