Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expected formatting of x509 certificate content not clear #22176

Open
1 task done
steilerDev opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Expected formatting of x509 certificate content not clear #22176

steilerDev opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@steilerDev
Copy link

Is this a docs issue?

  • My issue is about the documentation content or website

Type of issue

Other

Description

When connecting Docker to the IdP in the scenario of "Entra ID SAML 2.0" the expected formatting is not very clear.

While the documentation states "Copy your the contents of your Certificate (Base64) file from your text editor" (there also is an extra "your" that should be removed) it's not clear if "---- BEGINN CERTIFICATE ----" and "---- END CERTIFICATE -----" should be included or not.

Location

https://docs.docker.com/security/for-admins/single-sign-on/connect/

Suggestion

  • State explicitly that the "whole" content should be copied
  • Provide an example / screenshot showing the expected end result
  • (There could also be a "placeholder" text in the WebApp, but this is out of scope for the docs)
@steilerDev steilerDev added the status/triage Needs triage label Mar 6, 2025
@steilerDev steilerDev changed the title Espected formatting of content not clear Espected formatting of x509 certificate content not clear Mar 6, 2025
@steilerDev steilerDev changed the title Espected formatting of x509 certificate content not clear Expected formatting of x509 certificate content not clear Mar 6, 2025
@aevesdocker aevesdocker added area/security and removed status/triage Needs triage labels Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants