Fixed broken Data Mapper deserialization tests

[DanielleCogs]

Commit Type

• feature - New functionality
• fix - Bug fix
• refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
• perf - Performance improvement
• docs - Documentation update
• test - Test-related changes
• chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

• Low - Minor changes, limited scope
• Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
• High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Very important section of code where all tests should be running and passing. Increased coverage.

Impact of Change

• Users: none
• Developers: better testing of important scenarios
• System:

Test Plan

• Unit tests added/updated
• E2E tests added/updated
• Manual testing completed
• Tested in:

Contributors

Screenshots/Videos

[github-actions]

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

✅ PR Title

• Current: Fixed broken Data Mapper deserialization tests
• Issue: The title is succinct and directly notes what was fixed and where.
• Recommendation: No changes needed; title is appropriately descriptive.

---

✅ Commit Type

• Properly selected (test)
• Only one selected, which is correct.

---

✅ Risk Level

• Only one level selected, and it aligns with the type of change (test-related, non-prod-impacting).

---

⚠️ What & Why

• Current: Very important section of code where all tests should be running and passing. Increased coverage.
• Issue: Content is present, but could be more specific about what was fixed (i.e., "Fixed deserialization tests for Data Mapper to ensure sufficient coverage and prevent regressions.").
• Recommendation: Briefly list specific classes/files/functions or types of deserialization covered for extra clarity. Example: Fixed failing Data Mapper deserialization tests by updating test cases to handle edge cases and increase scenario coverage.

---

⚠️ Impact of Change

• Impact to 'System' left blank.
• Recommendation:
  • Users: none (as stated)
  • Developers: Confirmed as 'better testing of important scenarios' ✔️
  • System: Please add brief comment, for example, "No impact to build/performance/dependencies."

---

✅ Test Plan

• Unit tests are selected, matching the body/title.

---

⚠️ Contributors

• Section blank.
• Recommendation: Optional, but recommended to mention PMs/designers/devs if they contributed.

---

✅ Screenshots/Videos

• Not applicable; no apparent visual changes. This section can safely be blank.

---

Summary Table

Section	Status	Recommendation
Title	✅
Commit Type	✅
Risk Level	✅
What & Why	⚠️	Add a more specific summary of what's fixed
Impact of Change	⚠️	Add a note under 'System'
Test Plan	✅
Contributors	⚠️	Tag contributors if applicable
Screenshots/Videos	✅

---

Please address the feedback on "What & Why", "Impact of Change (System)", and optionally "Contributors" to make your PR even clearer for your reviewers and downstream maintainers. Thank you for helping maintain high-quality docs!

---

Last updated: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 02:10:44 GMT