[gdb] Better handle typedefs to anonymous unions #195
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When compiled with clang, for a typedef to an anonymous union, gdb
will not be able to find a name and so 'name' is None. When that
happens, we should just not call strip_typedefs to keep a name
to refer to the type.
Because this only happens with clang, I have not written a testcase
for this bug. I did file a clang bug (see link in comment).
This shows up with base::internal::LockImpl::NativeHandle.