Skip to content

chore: rollback requiring CAPA e2e blocking #34982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

richardcase
Copy link
Contributor

Revert requiring that the CAPA blocking e2e job on presubmit. We are seeing lots of failures because there are only 10 aws accounts for boskos to handout and they are used by CAPA and kops. An account maybe tied for hours with the full e2e tests and then we try and run a small subset of tests on PR and this causes boskos resource reties to be exceeded.

//cc @nrb @AndiDog @dlipovetsky

Revert requiring that the CAPA blocking e2e job on presubmit. We are
seeing lots of failures because there are only 10 aws accounts for
boskos to handout and they are used by CAPA and kops. An account maybe
tied for hours with the full e2e tests and then we try and run a small
subset of tests on PR and this causes boskos resource reties to be
exceeded.

Signed-off-by: Richard Case <richard.case@outlook.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jun 12, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from luthermonson and nrb June 12, 2025 17:10
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Contributor Author

To see if things settle down after an initial flood

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2025
@nrb
Copy link
Contributor

nrb commented Jun 12, 2025

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nrb, richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@AndiDog
Copy link

AndiDog commented Jun 12, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2025
@richardcase
Copy link
Contributor Author

Things are looking better after the initial surge of job requests. Let's hold off reverting for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants