*: fix the issue about the case-insensitive in resource group hint

[nolouch]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #62361

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign elsa0520 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [lance6716]
• pkg/planner/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2025-07-11 07:05:38.259741466 +0000 UTC m=+2242590.982920447: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.3622%. Comparing base (833b1be) to head (0eca1fc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #62374        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8992%   73.3622%   +0.4629%     
================================================
  Files          1753       1753                
  Lines        484943     486832      +1889     
================================================
+ Hits         353520     357151      +3631     
+ Misses       109785     107995      -1790     
- Partials      21638      21686        +48     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	42.3716% <100.0000%> (?)
unit	72.1729% <100.0000%> (+0.0283%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.7804% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	46.3400% <ø> (+0.0383%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ti-chi-bot]

@nolouch: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
non-block-pull-unit-test-next-gen	0eca1fc	link	false	/test pull-unit-test-next-gen

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[nolouch]

/retest-required