Skip to content

feat(opentrons-ai-client): add 96ch low volume #18787

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Elyorcv
Copy link
Contributor

@Elyorcv Elyorcv commented Jul 1, 2025

Overview

Close AUTH-1847
PR adds 96ch low volume option

image

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

CI

Review requests

See UI and confirm 96 low channel exists

Risk assessment

Low

@Elyorcv Elyorcv changed the title added 96ch low volume feat(opentrons-ai-client): add 96ch low volume Jul 1, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.13%. Comparing base (00563f8) to head (3692c44).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge   #18787   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.13%   26.13%           
=======================================
  Files        3290     3290           
  Lines      286991   286991           
  Branches    29596    29604    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits        74996    75005    +9     
+ Misses     211965   211955   -10     
- Partials       30       31    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
opentrons-ai-client 3.20% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant