Skip to content

Analyzer/datadog #4132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 10, 2025
Merged

Analyzer/datadog #4132

merged 17 commits into from
Jun 10, 2025

Conversation

amanfcp
Copy link
Contributor

@amanfcp amanfcp commented May 9, 2025

Description:

This PR adds analyzer for DataDog
DataDog API docs: Link

Checklist:

  • Tests passing (make test-community)?
  • Lint passing (make lint this requires golangci-lint)?

@amanfcp amanfcp marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2025 15:56
@amanfcp amanfcp requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2025 15:56
@amanfcp amanfcp changed the title [Draft] - Analyzer/datadog Analyzer/datadog May 15, 2025
amanfcp added 3 commits May 18, 2025 20:53
- Simplified API key retrieval logic by removing redundant checks for "key".
- Enhanced permission binding extraction by introducing a new function for permissions.
- Cleaned up resource binding logic for better clarity and maintainability.
- Removed unnecessary ID fields from scopes.json to reduce clutter.
}

permissionBindings := secretInfoPermissionsToAnalyzerPermission(info.Permissions)
result.Bindings = analyzers.BindAllPermissions(*userResource, *permissionBindings...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what if userId is nil? nil check on L124, though already deref here.

@zricethezav zricethezav merged commit bb506f6 into trufflesecurity:main Jun 10, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants