Skip to content

SuiteSparse 7.11.0 (stable) #967

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 136 commits into
base: stable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

SuiteSparse 7.11.0 (stable) #967

wants to merge 136 commits into from

Conversation

DrTimothyAldenDavis
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

DrTimothyAldenDavis and others added 30 commits May 8, 2025 12:17
Signed-off-by: Migunova Anastasia <anastasiamigunova76@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Migunova Anastasia <anastasiamigunova76@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Migunova Anastasia <anastasiamigunova76@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Migunova Anastasia <anastasiamigunova76@gmail.com>
… in packaging

Signed-off-by: Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com>
made it possible to not replace ubuntu-latest in the ‘runs-on’ field with a specific version of ubuntu

Signed-off-by: Migunova Anastasia <anastasiamigunova76@gmail.com>
Replacing emulation with cross-compilation in the build-arch-emu.yaml workflow to speed up SuiteSparse builds
…emu.yaml workflow to speed up SuiteSparse builds"
Revert "Replacing emulation with cross-compilation in the build-arch-emu.yaml workflow to speed up SuiteSparse builds"
Support for variable length arrays is a GCC extension that is not
implemented by all C standard compliant compilers.
That helps by speeding up the iterations if the CI is used to fix build
or test errors.
LAGraph: Avoid GCC extensions to the standards
Move static targets into separate exports to allow splitting them off…
CI: Save the ccache even on build or test errors
graphblas: handling gcc compiler bug on power and s390
ssget: add new matrices (2984:2904) to index
comment about SEMICOLON in top-level README
GraphBLAS 10.1.1 and LAGraph 1.2 (still in progress)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants