Add document with Representatives #32
Conversation
Fixes #29
|
|
||
| ## Device and Sensors WG | ||
|
|
||
| - Rick Waldron: @rwaldron |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kborchers: I know this is in a moving process, but it's not clear to me what to do here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mentioned in #29 that after the discussion it made sense for Rick to continue his work under our flag so this is fine as is.
One thing I would say though is that we need to remove a number of these. We should not list community groups as our representatives as those don't require W3C membership for participation. We should also check with @bkardell to see if he is representing us on the HTML Accessibility Task Force as I'm unfamiliar with the requirements for joining that group.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Technically I am, though I haven't been super active there and the things I've done there I have mostly explicitly taken off the jQuery hat because I didn't feel like I was in a position on some of those things to say too much officially. I'd like to more though moving forward, especially if/as we launch more efforts - so I'd like to keep it.
Yeah, some of the CG stuff/Task force stuff is tricky.... For example, Extensible Web Community Group was affiliated with my personal W3C account and signed off by my employer, so technically I represent no one there officially.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not the only one with a say in this but we definitely want more involvement in a11y efforts so definitely stay on. We should chat about what work goes on there and more than likely you can just keep you jQF hat on all the time.
I'm thinking we just remove CG involvement from this document since it will likely be harder to track that and I don't want the jQF in the way of folks participating in those at will.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed the community groups and left the task force.
I believe this should be fine to go now.
Closes #29