Update picturefill.js from 2.1.0 to 2.3.0 #70
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Both in regular site and in demos.
|
Eh, that failing linthub is complaining about |
|
I wouldn't mind just pointing to some CDN for picturefill (latest) instead of hosting it. Is there such an option? |
|
Ok, should go with this instead. |
|
... shame there is no "latest" link... living on the edge is fun. |
|
Ok, so I'm also inclined to move to the min version. So let's just use: |
|
Ok, put together the alt at #71 |
marcoscaceres
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2015
Switched to using CDN version of picturefill (closes #70)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
2.3.0 was released 11 days ago, but the responsiveimages.org site was still using 2.1.0 so I thought it was time to update it. Both in regular site and in demos.