Skip to content

Fix conflicting requirements for post/info key 'accept-role' #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cblgh
Copy link
Member

@cblgh cblgh commented Mar 1, 2025

On merging the request for comments PR with the addition of a new key for post/info—a result of the moderation protocol being created—the new key, accept-role, had a change in its requirements from SHOULD to be RECOMMENDED. But during the merge something went wrong, causing accept-role to be listed as both RECOMMENDED and MUST, while the spirit of the change was to make it a recommendation.

This commit remedies the conflicting requirements.

On merging the [request for comments
PR](#23) with the addition of a new key
for `post/info`--a result of the moderation protocol being created--the new
key, `accept-role`, had a change in its requirements from SHOULD to be
RECOMMENDED. But during the merge something went wrong, causing `accept-role` to be listed
as both RECOMMENDED and MUST, while the spirit of the change was to make a
recommendation.

This commit remedies the conflicting requirements.
@hackergrrl
Copy link
Member

Makes sense to me. 👍🏻

Do you think it's worth bumping the draft version number? My own preference would be to, just to prevent any ambiguity.

@cblgh
Copy link
Member Author

cblgh commented Apr 5, 2025

Do you think it's worth bumping the draft version number? My own preference would be to, just to prevent any ambiguity.

I don't mind either way! My pov: for typos that do not affect behaviour I don't think it's needed but this is kind of straddling the line, so I think your preference to do so is probably wise :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants