Add Code of Conduct

[TomAugspurger]

Closes pandas-dev/pandas#11873

The bulk of it came from http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code_of_conduct.md

I took part of the section on reporting from https://swift.org/community/#code-of-conduct

I'm happy to be on the list of people to contact. I figured we could have a couple contributors and a couple community members. And just some policy to reaffirm that they're still OK with being contacted with reports every couple months or so.

[wesm]

Thanks, this is great. I'm happy to be on the CoC committee as needed

[jreback]

thanks Tom. I would volunteer as well.

[jorisvandenbossche]

+ 1 !

I would gladly volunteer as well, but I think we have to limit ourselves a bit, and make the list not too long (3 people seems good to me)

[njsmith]

It sounds like you'll have no shortage of volunteers, but if you want an "external member" or two in the mix then I'd be happy to serve as well.

[jreback]

lgtm

[aterrel]

I would urge you to find a diverse CoC committee.

[wesm]

Let's return to this -- I can make some contacts outside the core committership. I think it would be great to have a diverse set of perspectives

[jorisvandenbossche]

Conclusion from the dev meeting was: "Text seems to be fine, just would like a diverse committee.
Titus Brown put me (Tom) in contact with a couple people who said they’d be interested in being on it, would post on the PR (haven’t yet)"

@TomAugspurger What remains is filling in those names I think (and asking if they want to do it)?

[TomAugspurger]

Through email @camillescott said she'd be interested, is that still the case? If not, feel free to ignore 😄

Also, @sarguido might have expressed interest? If I misread that conversation, again feel free to ignore.

[camillescott]

Been travelling and whatnot, def still interested

[wesm]

@camillescott it would be great to have you on the committee.

@captainsafia would you be interested in helping with this?

From the other volunteers on the thread (would be great to have @njsmith if you're still up for it?), I think we can set a crew of 5 or so and have a quick consensus vote.

[captainsafia]

@wesm: Sure — happy to help!

[wesm]

cool!

Team: what do you all think about this for our inaugural pandas CoC committee:

• Tom Augspurger @TomAugspurger
• Camille Scott @camillescott
• Safia Abdalla @captainsafia
• Nathaniel Smith @njsmith
• Joris van den Bossche @jorisvandenbossche

If anyone of you would not like to be on the committee, let me know. This includes 2 pandas core members and 3 members from the broader contributor base / community.

If you're all on board we can have a (lazy) consensus vote (leave your +1 if you agree) from the core team and close the vote in 72 hours or so.

Thanks!

[TomAugspurger]

+1

Thanks Safia, Camille, and Nathaniel.

On Jul 28, 2016, at 15:56, Wes McKinney notifications@github.com wrote:

cool!

Team: what do you all think about this for our inaugural pandas CoC committee:

Tom Augspurger @TomAugspurger
Camille Scott @camillescott
Safia Abdalla @captainsafia
Nathaniel Smith @njsmith
Joris van den Bossche @jorisvandenbossche
If anyone of you would not like to be on the committee, let me know. This includes 2 pandas core members and 3 members from the broader contributor base / community.

If you're all on board we can have a (lazy) consensus vote (leave your +1 if you agree) from the core team and close the vote in 72 hours or so.

Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[wesm]

+1 -- vote passes by lazy consensus =) I'll amend the governance documents to reflect the new CoC committee. Thank you everyone