Open
Description
Background
I am coming back to Mesa after being away for some time, so I am seeing things with semi-fresh eyes. Anyone coming to the examples repo looking for how this tool could be applied to their problem may find themselves a bit frustrated/confused.
Currently, the directory structure looks like:
- /examples
- /gis
- /rl
But the README is organized as:
- Grid Spacce
- Continuous Space
- Network
- Visualization
- GIS
- Other
Issues
- The number of examples described in the README does not match the actual number of examples in the repo. Need to verify/add examples.
- Does the outline in README effectively categorize the existing examples such that each example can be binned to a single category?
- If so, should the examples be reorganized to match? I would recommend either moving them all into a single folder and using the main README to provide the overall organization/navigation, or using directories that match the README.
- The GIS examples are represented in the README differently (just bullet-points with example name) that the other examples (name in headers with short example description). Would it be helpful to standardize this?
- There are variations between examples that could be easily cleaned up to keep things consistent. e.g.:
Readme.md
vsREADME.md
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels