-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: rename C files to follow current project conventions #6410
Conversation
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: na - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: passed - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
/stdlib merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
As the CI failure does not appear to be due to changes in this PR but stems from limitation in our existing tooling (i.e., not using |
PR-URL: stdlib-js#6410 Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: stdlib-bot <noreply@stdlib.io>
@kgryte Is this a challenging thing to integrate? |
@anandkaranubc No, not necessarily. In short, the problem is with https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/.github/workflows/scripts/run_affected_tests#L170. Right now, we simply assign the files list to the environment variable In principle, we should be able to limit the number of files which are assigned to
But that would mean that only 1 file is passed in at a time. Another way is to refactor the |
Resolves none.
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
This pull request:
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers