Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(stats): add nanskewness package #6046

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

impawstarlight
Copy link
Contributor

@impawstarlight impawstarlight commented Mar 14, 2025

Resolves #5623.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Adds the @stdlib/stats/incr/nanskewness package, which computes a corrected sample skewness incrementally, ignoring NaN values.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Mar 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Hi there! 👋

And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/incr/nanskewness 134 / 134
+ 100.00 %
7 / 7
+ 100.00 %
2 / 2
+ 100.00 %
134 / 134
+ 100.00 %

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. label Mar 15, 2025
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Mar 17, 2025

/stdlib update-copyright-years

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Mar 17, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Mar 17, 2025
@kgryte kgryte self-requested a review March 18, 2025 04:09
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@kgryte kgryte removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. labels Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after some clean-up.

@kgryte kgryte merged commit fe0ad15 into stdlib-js:develop Mar 18, 2025
14 checks passed
@impawstarlight impawstarlight deleted the feature/nanskewness branch March 24, 2025 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: add stats/incr/nanskewness
4 participants