You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Each time a {transform} examines the source indices and creates or updates the
destination index, it generates a _checkpoint_.
If your {transform} runs only once, there is logically only one checkpoint. If
your {transform} runs continuously, however, it creates checkpoints as it
ingests and transforms new source data. The `sync` property of the {transform}
configures checkpointing by specifying a time field.
To create a checkpoint, the {ctransform}:
. Checks for changes to source indices.
+
Using a simple periodic timer, the {transform} checks for changes to the source
indices. This check is done based on the interval defined in the transform's
`frequency` property.
+
If the source indices remain unchanged or if a checkpoint is already in progress
then it waits for the next timer.
+
If changes are found a checkpoint is created.
. Identifies which entities and/or time buckets have changed.
+
The {transform} searches to see which entities or time buckets have changed
between the last and the new checkpoint. The {transform} uses the values to
synchronize the source and destination indices with fewer operations than a
full re-run.
. Updates the destination index (the {dataframe}) with the changes.
+
--
The {transform} applies changes related to either new or changed entities or
time buckets to the destination index. The set of changes can be paginated. The
{transform} performs a composite aggregation similarly to the batch {transform}
operation, however it also injects query filters based on the previous step to
reduce the amount of work. After all changes have been applied, the checkpoint
is complete.
--
This checkpoint process involves both search and indexing activity on the
cluster. We have attempted to favor control over performance while developing
{transforms}. We decided it was preferable for the {transform} to take longer to
complete, rather than to finish quickly and take precedence in resource
consumption. That being said, the cluster still requires enough resources to
support both the composite aggregation search and the indexing of its results.
TIP: If the cluster experiences unsuitable performance degradation due to the
{transform}, stop the {transform} and refer to <>.
[discrete]
[[sync-field-ingest-timestamp]]
== Using the ingest timestamp for syncing the {transform}
In most cases, it is strongly recommended to use the ingest timestamp of the
source indices for syncing the {transform}. This is the most optimal way for
{transforms} to be able to identify new changes. If your data source follows the
{ecs-ref}/ecs-reference.html[ECS standard], you might already have an
{ecs-ref}/ecs-event.html#field-event-ingested[`event.ingested`] field. In this
case, use `event.ingested` as the `sync`.`time`.`field` property of your
{transform}.
If you don't have a `event.ingested` field or it isn't populated, you can set it
by using an ingest pipeline. Create an ingest pipeline either using the
<> (like the example below) or via {kib}
under **Stack Management > Ingest Pipelines**. Use a
<> to set the field and associate it with the
value of the ingest timestamp.
[source,console]
----------------------------------
PUT _ingest/pipeline/set_ingest_time
{
"description": "Set ingest timestamp.",
"processors": [
{
"set": {
"field": "event.ingested",
"value": "{{{_ingest.timestamp}}}"
}
}
]
}
----------------------------------
After you created the ingest pipeline, apply it to the source indices of your
{transform}. The pipeline adds the field `event.ingested` to every document with
the value of the ingest timestamp. Configure the `sync`.`time`.`field` property
of your {transform} to use the field by using the
<> for new {transforms} or the
<> for existing {transforms}. The
`event.ingested` field is used for syncing the {transform}.
Refer to <> and <> to learn more about
how to use an ingest pipeline.
[discrete]
[[ml-transform-checkpoint-heuristics]]
== Change detection heuristics
When the {transform} runs in continuous mode, it updates the documents in the
destination index as new data comes in. The {transform} uses a set of heuristics
called change detection to update the destination index with fewer operations.
In this example, the data is grouped by host names. Change detection detects
which host names have changed, for example, host `A`, `C` and `G` and only
updates documents with those hosts but does not update documents that store
information about host `B`, `D`, or any other host that are not changed.
Another heuristic can be applied for time buckets when a `date_histogram` is
used to group by time buckets. Change detection detects which time buckets have
changed and only update those.
[discrete]
[[ml-transform-checkpoint-errors]]
== Error handling
Failures in {transforms} tend to be related to searching or indexing.
To increase the resiliency of {transforms}, the cursor positions of
the aggregated search and the changed entities search are tracked in memory and
persisted periodically.
Checkpoint failures can be categorized as follows:
* Temporary failures: The checkpoint is retried. If 10 consecutive failures
occur, the {transform} has a failed status. For example, this situation might
occur when there are shard failures and queries return only partial results.
* Irrecoverable failures: The {transform} immediately fails. For example, this
situation occurs when the source index is not found.
* Adjustment failures: The {transform} retries with adjusted settings. For
example, if a parent circuit breaker memory errors occur during the composite
aggregation, the {transform} receives partial results. The aggregated search is
retried with a smaller number of buckets. This retry is performed at the
interval defined in the `frequency` property for the {transform}. If the search
is retried to the point where it reaches a minimal number of buckets, an
irrecoverable failure occurs.
If the node running the {transforms} fails, the {transform} restarts from the
most recent persisted cursor position. This recovery process might repeat some
of the work the {transform} had already done, but it ensures data consistency.