-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use strict variance checks for strict subtype checks unconditionally #48123
Draft
weswigham
wants to merge
2
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
weswigham:strict-subtype-no-bivariance
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+770
−101
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ | ||
//// [strictSubtypeReduction.ts] | ||
// Repro from #41977 | ||
|
||
class S1 { | ||
static f(a: number | string): void { } | ||
} | ||
|
||
class S2 { | ||
static f(a: number): void { } | ||
static g(a: number): void { } | ||
} | ||
|
||
function f(a: number): void { } | ||
function g(a: number): void { } | ||
|
||
// Declaring the following type aliases should have no effect | ||
|
||
type T1 = typeof S2.g; | ||
type T2 = typeof g; | ||
|
||
// All should have type ((a: number) => void)[] | ||
|
||
const y1 = [S1.f, f]; | ||
const y2 = [S1.f, g]; | ||
const y3 = [S1.f, S2.f]; | ||
const y4 = [S1.f, S2.g]; | ||
|
||
// All assignments should be errors in strict mode, but won't be without strict function types on | ||
|
||
const x1: ((ctrl: number | string) => void)[] = y1; | ||
const x2: ((ctrl: number | string) => void)[] = y2; | ||
const x3: ((ctrl: number | string) => void)[] = y3; | ||
const x4: ((ctrl: number | string) => void)[] = y4; | ||
|
||
//// [strictSubtypeReduction.js] | ||
// Repro from #41977 | ||
var S1 = /** @class */ (function () { | ||
function S1() { | ||
} | ||
S1.f = function (a) { }; | ||
return S1; | ||
}()); | ||
var S2 = /** @class */ (function () { | ||
function S2() { | ||
} | ||
S2.f = function (a) { }; | ||
S2.g = function (a) { }; | ||
return S2; | ||
}()); | ||
function f(a) { } | ||
function g(a) { } | ||
// All should have type ((a: number) => void)[] | ||
var y1 = [S1.f, f]; | ||
var y2 = [S1.f, g]; | ||
var y3 = [S1.f, S2.f]; | ||
var y4 = [S1.f, S2.g]; | ||
// All assignments should be errors in strict mode, but won't be without strict function types on | ||
var x1 = y1; | ||
var x2 = y2; | ||
var x3 = y3; | ||
var x4 = y4; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a pretty big correctness improvement, so we should document it as a breaking change