Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking β€œSign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a test case for too-complex in match case, for discussion #9667

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ› Bug fix
βœ“ πŸ“œ Docs

Description

See astral-sh/ruff#11421 for initial reasoning behind this. I think we should modify the way we compute match case. But not sure if we should add a new visit method in pylint or add a get_children method for match case in astroid so we ends up not having to modify anything on the pylint side (and would benefit from it elsewhere too ?).

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added Discussion πŸ€” Needs specification πŸ” Accepted as a potential improvement, and needs to specify edge cases, message names, etc. labels May 22, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas requested a review from cdce8p May 22, 2024 07:22

This comment has been minimized.

@cdce8p
Copy link
Member

cdce8p commented Jun 8, 2024

But not sure if we should add a new visit method in pylint or add a get_children method for match case in astroid so we ends up not having to modify anything on the pylint side (and would benefit from it elsewhere too ?).

get_children should already work same as visitMatchCase. I haven't looked into the mccabe extension yet, so not sure I can really help with that at this point.

@cdce8p cdce8p removed their request for review June 8, 2024 08:37
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. πŸ€–πŸŽ‰

This comment was generated for commit b1ba516

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion πŸ€” Needs specification πŸ” Accepted as a potential improvement, and needs to specify edge cases, message names, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants