refactor: Password input constractor

[shaohuzhang1]

refactor: Password input constractor

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The code looks mostly well-formed, but there are a few areas that could be optimized or corrected:

1. HTML Structure: The HTML structure is correct and semantically appropriate.

2. TypeScript Setup: The setup function in Vue 3 uses TypeScript correctly with defineProperties, defineEmits, computed, watch, etc.

3. Computed Properties and Watches: The computed properties (formValue) and watches are functioning as expected to handle updates.

4. Data Methods:

   • getData: This method correctly returns an object containing the form data.
   • rander: This method updates the form values based on incoming form data.

5. Validation Rules:

   • The validation rules in rangeRules ensure that both fields have valid lengths before submission.
   • The rules computation checks if the length constraints are met when needed.

6. Style Scopes: The SASS scope is properly defined within .defaultValueItem.

Suggestions for Improvement:

• Default Values in Template: Currently, the placeholder text for default_value is hardcoded. Make sure this should come from translations if available.

• Password Visibility Toggle: Ensure the password visibility toggle functionality works as intended. If it doesn't, consider using a library like vue-password-toggle.

• Testing Edge Cases: Although not critical here, thoroughly test extreme cases such as very short and long string inputs to ensure all conditions behave as expected.

Additional Considerations:

• Accessibility: Ensure the page meets accessibility standards. For example, make sure aria labels are used appropriately.

• Internationalization: Since t comes from '@/locales', ensure $route.name (or similar dynamic route handling) is working correctly to provide context-sensitive translation messages.

Overall, the existing code is functional and follows best practices. Minor improvements can enhance readability and maintainability.

[shaohuzhang1]

There are several issues and improvements that can be made to this Vue.js template and JavaScript code:

1. Type Script Mismatch: The maxlength and minlength attributes should use numbers instead of strings. This is consistent with how input fields expect numerical values.

2. Switch Label Issue: Since you have an <el-switch> element for "Show Password," ensure the label matches the switch state correctly. Currently, it seems redundant since the value comes from formValue.show_password.

3. Remove Redundant Attributes: You shouldn't set both type and show-password directly because they might conflict or cause unexpected behavior. Remove one of them.

4. Avoid Global State Updates: Directly updating global variables like formValue.value in getData, rander, and other functions can lead to inconsistencies if not handled properly. Instead, consider using computed properties, reactive refs, or Vuex for a more clean and maintainable approach.

5. Comments and Logging: While logging (console.log(formValue.value.show_default_value)) has its purpose, try avoiding unnecessary logging unless debugging is needed.

Here's a revised version of the code:

<template>
  <el-form-item :label="$t('dynamicsForm.TextInput.length.label')" required>
    <el-row class="w-full">
      <el-col :span="11">
        <el-input-number v-model.number="value.maxlength" placeholder="Enter max length" />
      </el-col>
      <el-col :span="11">
        <el-input-number v-model.number="value.minlength" placeholder="Enter min length" />
      </el-col>
    </el-row>

    <el-form-item :label="$t('dynamicsForm.TextInput.text.type')">Text Type</el-form-item>
    <el-radio-group v-model:value.type>
        <el-radio-button label="text">Text Input</el-radio-button>
        <el-radio-button label="password">Password Input</el-radio-button>
    </el-radio-group>

    <el-form-item :label="$t('dynamicsForm.TextInput.placeholder')">Placeholder</el-form-item>
    <el-input v-model:value.placeholder />

    <el-form-item :label="$t('dynamicsForm.TextInput.default')">
      Default Value <em>(Optional)</em></el-form-item>
    <el-input v-model:value.default-value />
  </el-form-item>
</template>

<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
// Assume formValue is defined somewhere and imported
export default defineComponent({
  data() {
    return {
      value: {
        maxlen: null,
        minlength: null,
        type: 'text',
        placeholder: '',
        default_value: '',
        show_default_value: true,
      },
    };
  },
});
</script>

In this improved version:

• The v-model.number directive ensures numeric handling for maxlength and minlength.
• Removed redundancy by setting just one attribute (type) based on radio button selection.
• Used a structured approach for managing form values and types.
• Simplified logic through the introduction of a value object encapsulating all field-related properties.

[shaohuzhang1]

There are no immediate issues with the provided code snippet. It appears to be correct in terms of syntax and structure, though there's an empty else block after the first if statement in the getDefaultValue function that could potentially cause runtime errors if not used correctly.

Here is the updated version with potential improvements suggested:

// Function to check input types and display corresponding tags
function handleInputTypeTags(row) {
  switch (row.input_type) {
    case 'TextInput':
      return <el-tag type="info" class="info-tag">{{ $t('dynamicsForm.input_type_list.TextInput') }}</el-tag>;
    case 'PasswordInput':
      return (
        <>
          <el-tag type="info" class="info-tag">
            {{ $t('dynamicsForm.input_type_list.PasswordInput') }}
          </el-tag>
          {/* Show the password field placeholder here */}
        </>
      );
    case 'Slider':
      return <el-tag type="info" class="info-tag">{{ $t('dynamicsForm.input_type_list.Slider') }}</el-tag>;
    default:
      // Handle other cases if needed
      break;
  }
}

// Update the refreshFieldTitle function usage
const refreshFieldTitle = (data) => {
  // Use a loop to process each element in data array using handleInputTypeTags
};

// Updated getDefaultValue function handling PasswordInput
const getDefaultValue = (row) => {
  if (row.default_value && row.option_list) {
    const filteredValues = row.option_list.filter((v) =>
      row.default_value.includes(v.value)
    );
    if (filteredValues.length > 0) {
      return filteredValues[0].value; // Return the first available value from option_list
    } else {
      return 'No matching values found';
    }
  }
};

Optimization Suggestions:

1. Switch Statement for Input Type Handling: The use of a switch statement makes the logic more readable and easier to maintain compared to multiple if/else if statements.

2. Placeholder Display in PasswordTag: In the modified handleInputTypeTags, added a placeholder to indicate where you can add the actual password field when displaying this tag. This prevents accidental showing of passwords in plain text.

3. Handling Case Where No Matching Values Found: Added a message indicating what should happen if no matching values are found. Adjust based on your application needs.

4. Default Value Filtering: Enhanced getDefaultValues method by returning only one value if multiple matches exist, ensuring it behaves consistently across different scenarios.

These changes make the code cleaner and more functional while keeping performance considerations in mind where necessary.