Skip to content

Preparation for the eventual merge of PR116 with Archives update #260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jonasbardino
Copy link
Contributor

Preparation for the eventual merge of PR116 with Archives update functionality. We want the basic CSS in now in order to support similar manual updates until we complete and merge that PR.

…tionality.

We want the basic CSS in now in order to support similar manual updates until
we complete and merge that PR.
@jonasbardino jonasbardino requested a review from aputtu June 12, 2025 06:32
@jonasbardino jonasbardino self-assigned this Jun 12, 2025
@jonasbardino jonasbardino added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 12, 2025
jonasbardino added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2025
…tionality.

We want the basic CSS in now in order to support similar manual updates until
we complete and merge that PR.

Rerun of PR #260 against `next` instead of now frozen `edge`.
@jonasbardino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #271.

jonasbardino added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
…xt) (#271)

Preparation for the eventual merge of PR116 with Archives update
functionality. We want the basic CSS in now in order to support similar
manual updates until we complete and merge that PR.

Rerun of PR #260 against `next` instead of now frozen `edge`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Manually updated frozen Archives using a strategy like PR116 are missing CSS to style header.
1 participant