Add PT-BR automatic translation softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd

[yabellini]

No description provided.

[beatrizmilz]

Vou fazer a primeira revisão!

[rffontenelle]

@yabellini considering my first review, can you please mark need second review?

[yabellini]

Thanks @rffontenelle !! Status changed 😄

[yabellini]

@rffontenelle where we can see your first review?

[rffontenelle]

Weird. I'll check that later in my computer

[rffontenelle]

@beatrizmilz I actually barely started and stopped. So please feel free to proceed reviewing this.

@yabellini So, we are actually in need of the first review. You may want to undo the labels changes.

Sorry for the noise!

[yabellini]

No problem at all!
I will update and thanks for all the work you are doing for the translation

[yabellini]

The first review is happening here: https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide/pull/852/files by @beatrizmilz
She will let us know when it is ready for a second review.
Work started in the Traslatón.

[brunomioto]

If it's a need, I can do the second review.

[yabellini]

Hi @brunomioto ! Thanks for your offer. 🙏
Bea is still working on this PR; we can let you know when it is ready. In the meantime, if you want to do a second review, this PR needs one: #824

[beatrizmilz]

Hi @yabellini ! I have migrated all the comments/suggestions from #852 to this PR. Is that ok? I think it will be easier for us to follow up the review here.

And since this PR is older, I don't remember why I did create a new (#852) in the first place.

I will copy the message I have left in the other PR:

---

Hi! I have finished the first review of this chapter.

I have based the review of the translation for this document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ropensci/dev_guide/refs/heads/main/softwarereview_intro.Rmd - there are some things that were diferent (probably because this branch was from some months ago) and I have used that file to check if anything needed to be updated.

I have left some comments in the translation so we can discuss.

[beatrizmilz]

This part is quite different because the file in English has been updated since the begining of the translation process:
https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide/blob/main/softwarereview_intro.Rmd

Suggested change

	### Editores associados {#associateditors}
	O processo de revisão por pares de software da rOpenSci é conduzido por:
	```{r}
	#| child: "associate-editors.md"
	```
	### Equipe editorial
	Nossa equipe atual de editores(as) para revisão por pares de software inclui:
	```{r}
	#| echo: false
	#| results: 'asis'
	if (nzchar(Sys.getenv("AIRTABLE_API_KEY"))) {
	source(file.path("scripts", "airtable-get-editors.R"), local = knitr::knit_global())
	} else {
	cat("_No Airtable data available._")
	}
	```

[yabellini]

Thank you @beatrizmilz ! This is ready for your review @fblpalmeira .

[fblpalmeira]

@maelle @yabellini @beatrizmilz Apologies for the delay in submitting the review. I was finally able to review the chapter attentively!

[fblpalmeira]

Thank you @beatrizmilz ! This is ready for your review @fblpalmeira .

Done!

[yabellini]

Thank you😎🥳

[yabellini]

@maelle can you check why is failling to build the book? The log mention an error with the gen_ed_out() funciton between the lines 100 and 106. Thanks!

[maelle]

I'll just try merging it