[[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] in the example tables is wrong

[nicolo-ribaudo]

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#table-module-graph-cycle-async-fields-2

Once an async module transitions to EVALUATED, the [[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] field is set to DONE. It's useful to still show the number in the tables, so maybe we could say "DONE (was 2)"?

@tc39/ecma262-editors Any opinion about "DONE" vs "DONE (was ...)"?

[bakkot]

Editors discussed and think just ~done~ is better, since you can scroll up a few tables and see the original number if you particularly want to know.