formula: allow excluding deprecate! reason when disable! exists

[cho-m]

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your changes? Here's an example.
• Have you successfully run brew style with your changes locally?
• Have you successfully run brew typecheck with your changes locally?
• Have you successfully run brew tests with your changes locally?

---

[cho-m]

For convenience, I've set @deprecation_reason even if before @deprecation_date. I don't think this should be an issue and information can be used on formulae page or by 3rd-party usage of API.

Otherwise, would have to deal with resetting the info to nil.

[p-linnane]

This is a fantastic idea. Thanks @cho-m!

[reitermarkus]

Not really relevant for this PR, but are these automatically sorted in this order by another cop? To me it would make more sense to have deprecate! sorted first.

[cho-m]

It is from AST order:

brew/Library/Homebrew/ast_constants.rb

Lines 27 to 28 in 1d19230

	[{ name: :disable!, type: :method_call }],
	[{ name: :deprecate!, type: :method_call }],

Could reverse them if we wanted, though would need to make sure about handling. I did try to add code so order doesn't matter.

[cho-m]

Will look into order in #18974 prior to continuing this PR.

[cho-m]

Will wait until after #18733 is merged to finish this up.

[Anki-code1]

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your changes? Here's an example.
• Have you successfully run brew style with your changes locally?
• Have you successfully run brew typecheck with your changes locally?
• Have you successfully run brew tests with your changes locally?

[Anki-code1]

Details

#18661 #20033 #20147 #20134
https://github.com/TypeStrong/typedoc.git @WillAR37

• GITHUB-202410-GitHubDataProtectionAgreement.pdf

• GITHUB-202410-GitHubDataProtectionAgreement.pdf

• File size:

• 206 KB (211,074 bytes)

• Title: Got Project

• TPL - 2024 10 - GitHub Data Protection Agreement

• Author: William Drakus

• T. Greg Doucette

Subject: GitHub Data Protection Agreement

#https://assets.ctfassets.net/8aevphvgewt8/DaflLjyuIt6un69xg3n6W/375560a9e93004190548b6c581b81ef3/GITHUB-202410-GitHubDataProtectionAgreement.pdf

Keywords: #Date #Github #SSH #DPA

Creation Date: (06-16-2025

12/20/24, 12:30:18 PM
Modification Date:

12/20/24, 12:30:18 PM
Creator: William E Drakus

Word
PDF Producer:

macOS Version 15.1.1 (Build 24B91) Quartz PDFContext
PDF Version:

1.3
Page Count:

23
Page Size:

8.5 × 11 in (Letter, portrait)
Fast Web View:

No
Style Syntax Keyboard shortcut Example Output
Bold ** ** or __ __ Command+B (Mac) or Ctrl+B (Windows/Linux) This is bold text This is bold text
Italic * * or _ _      Command+I (Mac) or Ctrl+I (Windows/Linux) This text is italicized This text is italicized
Strikethrough ~~ ~~ or ~ ~ None This was mistaken text This was mistaken text
Bold and nested italic ** ** and _ _ None This text is extremely important This text is extremely important
All bold and italic *** *** None All this text is important All this text is important
Subscript None This is a _subscript text This is a subscript text
Superscript None This is a ^superscript text This is a superscript text
Underline None This is an underlined text This is an underlined text