feat: add C implementation for blas/base/dspr

[ShabiShett07]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: passed
• task: lint_repl_help status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_examples status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: missing_dependencies
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Progresses: 2039

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• adds package blas/base/dspr

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• progresses [RFC]: Add BLAS bindings and implementations for linear algebra (tracking issue) #2039

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
blas/base/dspr	$528/528$ $+100.00\mathrm{\%}$	$49/49$ $+100.00\mathrm{\%}$	$5/5$ $+100.00\mathrm{\%}$	$528/528$ $+100.00\mathrm{\%}$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

Suggested change

	c_dspr( CblasColMajor, CblasUpper, 3, 1.0, x, 1, AP );
	c_dspr( CblasRowMajor, CblasUpper, 3, 1.0, x, 1, AP );

Should this be row-major?

[kgryte]

Suggested change

	- **uplo**: `[in] CBLAS_UPLO` specifies whether the upper or lower triangular part of the symmetric matrix `A` should be referenced.
	- **uplo**: `[in] CBLAS_UPLO` specifies whether the upper or lower triangular part of the symmetric matrix `A` is supplied.