Skip to content

Resolution order dependent circular heritage #61711

Open
@LukeAbby

Description

@LukeAbby

🔎 Search Terms

resolution order dependent circular heritage, circular base type, circular mixin

🕗 Version & Regression Information

However, it appears this PR was the first time that circular heritage was (consistently) reported. Therefore this issue has essentially always existed.

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#code/PTAEDEEsA8FMBNSQGagJ4HsCuoDGGBbA2AOwBdQyALSAZ1ABtITZRsKMAnUWgd0jK4qlDKAAGAQVxkuABQAqAJQBMsMQDoAUPFi4GAQ06t8JWhWgAuUAElTZfSVyx5aAA6wAPGTewMqKTKcCiqwAHwA3JpRIKAAqrQIIjxUGLyUVPocJAxooPqgOu4kOo65GCTi8mJI9CxOtLSGuchc6caQnLhYBpwCaFoxEvTMADRtoMjM+gygRrQYDABuiYvTWKzwGLC1GBQEmWSwnFre7qAAIrBF8LQA8iQe8qGgALx5JGiR2ro9xgYNoACrQA3ppQKBXJwMK4rJdrncHgFIMsAKLIZC6MgAbQARJDoTiALoRTQAXyiOj0hlYJH0xForn0ThshwIoFB4JiUDgiBQ6GwPH4gmE1DoSQcSHIR2QTNgWnBp1Y1gIrgYsGI5EykHKrxsdgcThc7g85wwXQ1ZAAwv9aJbypMAOa46ysokk8nfKlGPA2lnq9lg0CWC5XUg3e4eJGo9GY3H41xuyIerkwRJ8zA4IwEDDLcZiADKWAARka1KAHaQjpBcBDDHTYIdjpoqQCgUElKoPIWSz5dQ40M9YNBDsV6G32cmwNy06gM7N1TnWNRWAXi6XqhWWL0a4zOPXG1oW-QXergp3u6W+x9B8Ow8fWROosxGzLmabzaQrTa7SRHQHOVOqa8rOApCA4FbiIqfiAtIcgdmWMiQT40Ftmenj9qEYiBm2VhQf4sHtiEXwARAQFICBOBgSQEFiHhfoEGh1SIbRyGoCeDHwR4GFYeC7G4ax9FoUmFI-NSPr6K20jIrAaIYtIoBDiONygNakCfu+WAWgAsjAzAABQAEISbAUYyTG0gAJT-hCUIwqAJCaUWRzCZ6vwTFgjhkNqFSqepZqaZ+OnQMwHiBimPLkfyOAMBgGAJBUy54OUZh7s+bCoGIRkJNaEm0BogZZbAOUAopd72bAaR6eo1WGA6tBWP2WKElZLzPBgRYAFaYiMmihIZxlWIVxW0BZg3GcNXyUm5R6gIVpmyZi1kmClWAEVVNWcHVsKhqOEbseoyqquqn5auUoQWUmQA

💻 Code

// Fixed if you comment this line out or switch to `ActorPTR2e`.
declare const x: InstanceType<typeof ActorPTR2e>;


// Used to show that only a dependency on `T` is necessary for the circularity.
// As in, the final resolved value does not matter.
type DependsOn<T> = any;

declare class Actor {
  prop: DependsOn<ActiveEffect["prop"]>;
}

declare namespace Item {
  // Fixed if you switch this to an interface.
  type Implementation = InstanceType<DocumentClassConfig["Item"]>;
}

declare class Item {
  x: DependsOn<ActiveEffect["prop"]>;
}

// Fixed if you remove the `SubType` generic parameter.
class ActorPTR2e<SubType = any> extends Actor {}

// Fixed if you remove the `SubType` generic parameter.
class ItemPTR2e<SubType = any> extends Item {}

interface DocumentClassConfig {
  // Fixed if you change `typeof ActorPTR2e` to `typeof ActorPTR2e<any>`
  Actor: typeof ActorPTR2e;

  // Fixed if you change `typeof ItemPTR2e` to `typeof ItemPTR2e<any>`
  Item: typeof ItemPTR2e;
}

declare class ActiveEffect extends ClientDocumentMixin(BaseActiveEffect) {
  prop: number;
}

declare function ClientDocumentMixin<
  // Fixed if you loosen the constraint of `BaseClass`.
  BaseClass extends new (...args: any[]) => object,
>(Base: BaseClass): BaseClass;

declare class BaseActiveEffect {
  constructor(...args: DependsOn<Item.Implementation>);
}

🙁 Actual behavior

Numerous errors, namely:

Type alias 'Implementation' circularly references itself.
Type 'ActiveEffect' recursively references itself as a base type.
'ActiveEffect' is referenced directly or indirectly in its own base expression.
'args' is referenced directly or indirectly in its own type annotation.

🙂 Expected behavior

No error, as seen when you comment out the line declare const x: InstanceType<typeof ActorPTR2e>;. The error going away indicates that this circularity is resolution order dependent.

I understand how odd the code is out of context but I did actually run into this in a real codebase.

Additional information about the issue

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Help WantedYou can do thisPossible ImprovementThe current behavior isn't wrong, but it's possible to see that it might be better in some cases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions