Skip to content

implement prettier format #1246

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

polatengin
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@polatengin polatengin self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@polatengin polatengin requested a review from BSamodien as a code owner June 24, 2025 03:06
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.49%. Comparing base (6482053) to head (63b1da1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1246      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.46%   53.49%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        3346     3346              
  Branches      901      901              
==========================================
+ Hits         1789     1790       +1     
+ Misses       1557     1556       -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

BSamodien
BSamodien previously approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
Signed-off-by: Engin Polat <enpolat@microsoft.com>
@polatengin polatengin merged commit 6b9c635 into main Jun 26, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@polatengin polatengin deleted the polatengin/implement-prettier-format branch June 26, 2025 03:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants