Skip to content

feat(abr-testing): Changed 96ch lv protocol to include more partial tip steps #18395

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rclarke0
Copy link
Contributor

@rclarke0 rclarke0 commented May 19, 2025

Overview

Changed Low Volume 96ch Protocol to Include more Partial Tip Steps

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

  • ran in ABR

Changelog

  • Changed ABR6 protocol to be a different protocol that includes more partial tip steps. This was changed because the protocol previously used was overly simple.
  • Removed unused protocols

Review requests

Risk assessment

@rclarke0 rclarke0 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2025 20:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.26%. Comparing base (75d0979) to head (29b697c).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge   #18395   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.26%   26.26%           
=======================================
  Files        3270     3270           
  Lines      280846   280846           
  Branches    32958    32958           
=======================================
  Hits        73776    73776           
  Misses     207041   207041           
  Partials       29       29           
Flag Coverage Δ
protocol-designer 19.51% <ø> (ø)
step-generation 4.39% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rclarke0 rclarke0 requested a review from skowalski08 June 5, 2025 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant