problem-specifications

Shared metadata for Exercism exercises.

Contributing Guide

Please see the contributing guide

Problem metadata

Each problem's data lives in a directory under exercises/

exercises/
├── accumulate
│   ├── description.md
│   └── metadata.yml
├── ...
├── minesweeper
│   ├── canonical-data.json
│   ├── description.md
│   └── metadata.yml
├── ...
└── zipper
    ├── description.md
    └── metadata.yml

There are three metadata files:

description.md - the basic problem description
metadata.yml - additional information about the problem, such as where it came from
canonical-data.json (optional) - standardized test inputs and outputs that can be used to implement the problem

Test Data Format (canonical-data.json)

This data can be incorporated into test programs manually or extracted by a program. The file format is described in canonical-schema.json, but it is easier to understand with a example:

{ "exercise": "foobar"
, "version" : "1.0.0"
, "comments":
    [ " Comments are always optional and can be used almost anywhere.      "
    , "                                                                    "
    , " They usually document how the exercise's readme ('description.md') "
    , " is generally interpreted in test programs across different         "
    , " languages.                                                         "
    , "                                                                    "
    , " In addition to a mainstream implementation path, this information  "
    , " can also document significant variations.                          "
    ]
, "cases":
    [ { "comments":
          [ " A test case must have a 'description' and a 'property'.  "
          , " Anything else is optional.                               "
          , "                                                          "
          , " The 'property' is a string in lowerCamelCase identifying "
          , " the type of test, but most of the times it is just the   "
          , " name of a function being tested.                         "
          , "                                                          "
          , " Test cases can have any number of additional keys, and   "
          , " most of them also have an 'expected' one, defining the   "
          , " value a test should return.                              "
          ]
      , "description": "Foo'ing a word returns it reversed"
      , "property"   : "foo"
      , "input"      : "lion"
      , "expected"   : "noil"
      }
    , { "description": "Bar'ing a name returns its parts combined"
      , "property"   : "bar"
      , "firstName"  : "Alan"
      , "lastName"   : "Smithee"
      , "expected"   : "ASlmainthee"
      }
    , { "comments":
          [ " Test cases can be arbitrarily grouped with a description "
          , " to make organization easier.                             "
          ]
      , "description": "Abnormal inputs: numbers"
      , "cases":
          [ { "description": "Foo'ing a number returns nothing"
            , "property"   : "foo"
            , "input"      : "42"
            , "expected"   : null
            }
          , { "description": "Bar'ing a name with numbers gives an error"
            , "property"   : "bar"
            , "firstName"  : "HAL"
            , "lastName"   : "9000"
            , "expected"   : { "error": "You should never bar a number" }
            }
          ]
      }
  ]
}

Keep in mind that the description should not simply explain what each case is (that is redundant information) but also why each case is there. For example, what kinds of implementation mistakes might this case help us find?

There are also some convention about expected that you must follow:

if the input is valid but there is no result for the input, the value at "expected" should be null.
if an error is expected (because the input is invalid, or any other reason), the value at "expected" should be an object containing exactly one property, "error", whose value is a string.
- The string should explain why the error would occur.
- A particular track's implementation of the exercise need not necessarily check that the error includes that exact string as the cause, depending on what is idiomatic in the language (it may not be idiomatic to check strings for error messages).

Test Data Versioning

Test data should be versioned according to Semantic Version 2.0, which is defined as follows:

Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:

MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and PATCH version when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes. Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.

MAJOR version changes

The MAJOR version should be changed when the test suite is modified in a fundamentally incompatible way.

There are examples of changes requiring a MAJOR version change:

A new "property" (test type).
Renaming a "property".
Insertion, deletion or renaming of keys in the test data object.
Changing the type of one of the test data keys.

MAJOR changes should be expected to break even well-behaved test generators.

MINOR version changes

The MINOR version should change when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, make non-breaking changes that alter the meaning of the test suite, make previously passing solutions possibly fail, or failing solutions fail at a different spot.

There are examples of changes requiring a MINOR version change:

Adding or deleting test cases.
Changing the test cases inputs and/or outputs.
Changing the test cases ordering.

MINOR changes would never break well-designed test generators, because the test-generation logic remains exactly the same.

PATCH version changes

The PATCH version should change when you make backwards-compatible bug fixes or whenever the meaning of the tests does not change.

There are examples of changes requiring a PATCH version change:

Regrouping/"Renesting" test cases without changing test case ordering.
Changing descriptions or comments.
Changing keys' ordering or formatting (would result in an equivalent JSON file).

PATCH changes would never break well-designed test generators, because the test data remains exactly the same.

Automated Tests

canonical-data.json for each exercise is checked for compliancy against the canonical-schema.json. In order to run these tests, you will need to have node and npm installed on your system. Install them from here. (npm comes bundled with most installations of node).

Install the required packages:

npm install

Run for all exercises:

npm test

Run for single exercise:

npm run test-one exercises/<exercise>/canonical-data.json

Replace <exercise> by the name of exercise which you want to check.

License

Vankog/problem-specifications

ErrorLooks like something went wrong!

About

Resources

License

Uh oh!

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages 0

Uh oh!

Languages

Error
Looks like something went wrong!

Packages