Skip to content

Conversation

lewis-sanchez
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes #19363

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 10, 2025

PR Changes

Category Main Branch PR Branch Difference
Code Coverage 59.51% 59.34% ⚪ 0.00%
VSIX Size 15485 KB 15500 KB ⚪ 15 KB ( 0% )
Webview Bundle Size 3768 KB 3768 KB ⚪ 0 KB ( 0% )

Copy link
Member

@kburtram kburtram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if we need this? Verses logging to the primary extension output channel.

@kburtram
Copy link
Member

My take on this PR is that we should probably send most the logging to a single channel, perhaps for very specific logging we might want to isolated it, but I don't think we should create a different logging channel for each feature area. Unless VS Code is recommending extensions do that.

@Benjin
Copy link
Contributor

Benjin commented May 22, 2025

@kburtram

Unless I'm misunderstanding, I think we're already doing that; everything's going to the MSSQL channel
image
image

@lewis-sanchez lewis-sanchez requested a review from Benjin June 26, 2025 20:51
@lewis-sanchez lewis-sanchez merged commit 872c56a into main Jun 26, 2025
5 checks passed
@lewis-sanchez lewis-sanchez deleted the lewissanchez/chathandler/add-logging-channel branch June 26, 2025 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[GitHub Copilot - Bug]: Consider logging channel for copilot messages
3 participants