Add link to issue on non-testability of the Dynamic Code Brand Checks proposal #536
+2
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… proposal. Following up on @ljharb's suggestion #535 (comment)
|
Maybe we could link to WPT tests instead? The discussion in plenary was "this cannot be tested in test262, but we approve stage 2.7 because it's at least tested in WPT". |
|
@nicolo-ribaudo are there WPT tests already? If not, we could add a link to them later either here or in the test262 issue. |
|
cc @lukewarlow :) |
|
https://wpt.fyi/results/trusted-types?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=eval this shows the various test files that test TT with eval. https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/trusted-types%2Feval-csp-no-tt.html this is probably the one closest to testing the pure tc39 aspect of this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following up on @ljharb's suggestion #535 (comment)