You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When navigating large results for birds-eye assessment/triage of findings, it is a bit frustrating to click on a QL result in vscode, jump into the code nagivation pane, and then lose your place in the QL selection list.
Additionally, the workflow for navigating the results would be a bit more smooth if you could navigate up/down the the result list with e.g. the arrow keys.
Describe the solution you'd like
If possible, keep a lingering highlight of the last selected QL result in the QL results pane.
If possible, make it so that when in the result pane, you can navigate up/down the list with a keyboard shortcut, ideally when navigating results, the code pane updates with the selected result without switching focus, so you can walk the results and do rapid review of large sets of findings.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When navigating large results for birds-eye assessment/triage of findings, it is a bit frustrating to click on a QL result in vscode, jump into the code nagivation pane, and then lose your place in the QL selection list.
Additionally, the workflow for navigating the results would be a bit more smooth if you could navigate up/down the the result list with e.g. the arrow keys.
Describe the solution you'd like
If possible, keep a lingering highlight of the last selected QL result in the QL results pane.
If possible, make it so that when in the result pane, you can navigate up/down the list with a keyboard shortcut, ideally when navigating results, the code pane updates with the selected result without switching focus, so you can walk the results and do rapid review of large sets of findings.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: