Skip to content

Remove codeQL.model.editor feature flag #2822

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

Remove codeQL.model.editor feature flag #2822

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

robertbrignull
Copy link
Contributor

Makes the model editor available without either the codeQL.model.editor or codeQL.canary feature flags.

Checklist

  • CHANGELOG.md has been updated to incorporate all user visible changes made by this pull request.
  • Issues have been created for any UI or other user-facing changes made by this pull request.
  • [Maintainers only] If this pull request makes user-facing changes that require documentation changes, open a corresponding docs pull request in the github/codeql repo and add the ready-for-doc-review label there.

@robertbrignull robertbrignull requested a review from a team September 15, 2023 11:29
@robertbrignull robertbrignull requested a review from a team as a code owner September 15, 2023 11:29
koesie10
koesie10 approved these changes Sep 15, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@koesie10 koesie10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@robertbrignull robertbrignull merged commit 1c81eb1 into main Sep 18, 2023
@robertbrignull robertbrignull deleted the robertbrignull/model-editor-feature-flag branch September 18, 2023 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@koesie10 koesie10

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@robertbrignull @koesie10