Skip to content

remove async storage from http2 server instrumentation #5947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wconti27
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Plugin Checklist

Additional Notes

@wconti27 wconti27 self-assigned this Jun 24, 2025
@wconti27 wconti27 marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 16:26
@wconti27 wconti27 requested review from a team as code owners June 24, 2025 16:26
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Overall package size

Self size: 9.61 MB
Deduped: 108.63 MB
No deduping: 109.01 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.7.0 | 35.02 MB | 35.02 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 9.0.0 | 19.6 MB | 19.61 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 4.0.0 | 11.72 MB | 11.73 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.9.0 | 9.77 MB | 10.14 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.30.1 | 908.66 kB | 7.16 MB | | protobufjs | 7.5.3 | 2.95 MB | 5.6 MB | | @datadog/wasm-js-rewriter | 4.0.1 | 2.85 MB | 3.58 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.1 | 1.02 MB | 1.43 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.8.0 | 1.21 MB | 1.21 MB | | jsonpath-plus | 10.3.0 | 617.18 kB | 1.08 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.14.2 | 122.36 kB | 850.93 kB | | lru-cache | 10.4.3 | 804.3 kB | 804.3 kB | | source-map | 0.7.4 | 226 kB | 226 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | limiter | 3.0.0 | 157.92 kB | 157.92 kB | | pprof-format | 2.1.0 | 111.69 kB | 111.69 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.1 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 7.0.5 | 63.38 kB | 63.38 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.2 | 34.37 kB | 34.37 kB | | rfdc | 1.4.1 | 27.15 kB | 27.15 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.9 | 25.11 kB | 25.11 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.3 | 23.74 kB | 23.74 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | semifies | 1.0.0 | 15.84 kB | 15.84 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | ttl-set | 1.0.0 | 4.61 kB | 9.69 kB | | mutexify | 1.4.0 | 5.71 kB | 8.74 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | koalas | 1.0.2 | 6.47 kB | 6.47 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.4 | 3.96 kB | 3.96 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-07-08 18:58:37

Comparing candidate commit ee086fb in PR branch conti/remove-async-storage-http2 with baseline commit b4edcab in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1274 metrics, 49 unstable metrics.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: conti/remove-async-storage-http2
Commit report: f4a3208
Test service: dd-trace-js-integration-tests

✅ 0 Failed, 1259 Passed, 0 Skipped, 13m 55.25s Total Time

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.23529% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.86%. Comparing base (b4edcab) to head (ee086fb).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ckages/dd-trace/src/plugins/util/inferred_proxy.js 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5947      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.86%   81.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         472      472              
  Lines       19426    19435       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        15904    15911       +7     
- Misses       3522     3524       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@wconti27 wconti27 requested a review from rochdev June 26, 2025 14:41

return finishServerCh.runStores({ req: this.req, ...ctx }, () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The context should be altered and passed directly instead of creating a new object.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, if I understand the new code correctly, it now restores the parent context here where before it was restoring the current context. This means event listeners will no longer be in the context of the span. I'm not sure which is the expected behaviour, especially if there was no test for this, but to be safe it's probably best to keep the previous behaviour.

@@ -92,7 +93,7 @@ const web = {
analyticsSampler.sample(span, config.measured, true)
},

startSpan (tracer, config, req, res, name) {
startSpan (tracer, config, req, res, name, traceCtx) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't find where traceCtx is passed as a parameter in this PR.

childOf = span

log.debug('Successfully created inferred proxy span.')

setInferredProxySpanTags(span, proxyContext)

if (traceCtx) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is repeated in a few places at this point. Could we maybe create a WebPlugin that would reuse the existing code instead in addition to call the util?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants