Skip to content

Document path behaviour and access restrictions #1567

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KtorZ
Copy link

@KtorZ KtorZ commented Mar 7, 2025

Description

The cache restore strategy behavior seems to include the path somehow, which may come as a surprise when trying to reuse caches across jobs/workflows.

Motivation and Context

Thanks to this comment which saved me some headache; I thought it wouldn't hurt to add some warning for the next person.

Possibly related to: #1561, #1491 and #1426.

How Has This Been Tested?

The behavior was confirmed (v4) when trying to re-use a cache built from a separate workflow job. No cache-hit initially because of a slightly different path value; cache hit as soon as this was fixed on the consumer side.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (add or update README or docs)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Thanks to this comment which saved me some headache: actions#1491 (comment)

related to actions#1561.
related to actions#1491.
related to actions#1426.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant