-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: improve local ai settings page #7643
chore: improve local ai settings page #7643
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request improves the local AI settings page by refactoring the UI components, state management, and user interaction for the local AI settings. It includes enhancements to the UI, simplified state management, and better error handling. Sequence diagram for toggling Local AI settingsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant LocalAISettingHeader
participant LocalAIToggleBloc
participant AIEventToggleLocalAI
participant LocalAISetting
User->LocalAISettingHeader: Clicks toggle
LocalAISettingHeader->LocalAIToggleBloc: add(LocalAIToggleEvent.toggle())
LocalAIToggleBloc->AIEventToggleLocalAI: send()
activate AIEventToggleLocalAI
AIEventToggleLocalAI-->>LocalAIToggleBloc: FlowyResult<LocalAIPB, FlowyError>
deactivate AIEventToggleLocalAI
LocalAIToggleBloc->LocalAISetting: add(LocalAIToggleEvent.handleResult(result))
Updated class diagram for LocalAIToggleBlocclassDiagram
class LocalAIToggleBloc {
-AIEventGetLocalAIState getLocalAiState
-AIEventToggleLocalAI toggleLocalAI
+LocalAIToggleBloc()
+Future<void> _handleEvent(LocalAIToggleEvent event, Emitter<LocalAiToggleState> emit)
+void _handleResult(Emitter<LocalAiToggleState> emit, FlowyResult<LocalAIPB, FlowyError> result)
+void _getLocalAiState()
}
LocalAIToggleBloc --|> Bloc
LocalAiToggleState <|-- ReadyLocalAiToggleState : extends
LocalAiToggleState <|-- LoadingLocalAiToggleState : extends
LocalAiToggleState <|-- ErrorLocalAiToggleState : extends
class LocalAiToggleState {
<<sealed>>
}
class ReadyLocalAiToggleState {
-bool isEnabled
+ReadyLocalAiToggleState(bool isEnabled)
}
class LoadingLocalAiToggleState {
+LoadingLocalAiToggleState()
}
class ErrorLocalAiToggleState {
-FlowyError error
+ErrorLocalAiToggleState(FlowyError error)
}
LocalAIToggleEvent <|-- _Toggle : extends
LocalAIToggleEvent <|-- _HandleResult : extends
class LocalAIToggleEvent {
<<sealed>>
}
class _Toggle {
+_Toggle()
}
class _HandleResult {
-FlowyResult<LocalAIPB, FlowyError> result
+_HandleResult(FlowyResult<LocalAIPB, FlowyError> result)
}
note for LocalAIToggleBloc "Refactored to simplify state management and improve error handling"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @richardshiue - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider extracting the toggle logic into a separate widget or function for better readability and maintainability.
- The PluginStateIndicator and InitLocalAIIndicator widgets could benefit from more descriptive names to better reflect their purpose.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
class _SettingItemWidget extends StatelessWidget { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (bug_risk): Key generation for setting items may need caution.
Using ValueKey(item.content + item.settingType.title) is concise, but ensure that the concatenated string always produces a unique key, especially if item content or title might revert to similar values. Consider whether a more robust unique identifier might be beneficial.
Suggested implementation:
class _SettingItemWidget extends StatelessWidget {
const _SettingItemWidget({Key? key, required this.item}) : super(key: key);
// Wherever _SettingItemWidget is created, update key generation.
// For example:
// key: ValueKey(item.id)
Make sure in all the widget instantiations where you currently build the _SettingItemWidget with a key like ValueKey(item.content + item.settingType.title), update it to use ValueKey(item.id) (or another reliably unique identifier from your data). If your item model does not have an "id", consider adding one or using another unique property.
65865ee
to
36ab09f
Compare
e4c5935
to
4f81b88
Compare
🥷 Ninja i18n – 🛎️ Translations need to be updatedProject
|
lint rule | new reports | level | link |
---|---|---|---|
Message without source | 1 | warning | contribute (via Fink 🐦) |
Missing translation | 87 | warning | contribute (via Fink 🐦) |
4f81b88
to
dfccffa
Compare
dfccffa
to
12a93a5
Compare
Feature Preview
PR Checklist
Summary by Sourcery
Improve the local AI settings page by refactoring the UI components, state management, and user interaction for the local AI settings
Enhancements:
Chores: