Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rofi: add IME support #387135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2025
Merged

rofi: add IME support #387135

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2025

Conversation

bew
Copy link
Contributor

@bew bew commented Mar 4, 2025

This PR should add IME support for Rofi.
I have never used IMEs and don't know how to set them up, but I've looked at the PR that added IME support in Rofi (shows use of xcb-imdkit) and the current meson.build#L89 for how to enable use of this lib (with imdkit=true meson option).

Resolves #387025

👉 I need someone to test that this is enough to make rofi work with IMEs

QUESTION: should I add a line in release notes?

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Mar 4, 2025
@imsuck
Copy link

imsuck commented Mar 5, 2025

Works with fine fcitx5. 👍

@bew bew marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 19:17
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
check,
glib,
buildPackages,

imeSupport ? false,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dunno its impact on closure size but if it's not too much I would say we could always use ime.
It's 2025 and IME + wayland should be defaults IMO.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review, yeah I wondered about having it by default, I pushed a new version without the imeSupport flag

@bew bew force-pushed the add-rofi-ime-support branch from 82be074 to 5e38027 Compare March 8, 2025 09:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 and removed 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Mar 8, 2025
@teto
Copy link
Member

teto commented Mar 23, 2025

looks ok in terms of closure 394.3 MiB -> 394.9 MiB. I've got some issues with my fcitx setup so can't test but it looks positive anyway so merging.

@teto teto merged commit fbc70df into NixOS:master Mar 23, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rofi: IMEs (fcitx5, ibus) not working in rofi
3 participants