Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tsx: init at 4.19.3 #391467

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

tsx: init at 4.19.3 #391467

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sdedovic
Copy link
Contributor

@sdedovic sdedovic commented Mar 20, 2025

Homepage: https://tsx.is
Description: TSX is an environment to natively execute typescript code with Node.js. It is more actively developed than ts-node.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@sdedovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 391467


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • tsx

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 8.has: maintainer-list (update) This PR changes `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix` label Mar 21, 2025
'';

# 8 / 85 tests are failing, I do not know why, while regular usage shows no issues.
doCheck = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

disable those 8 tests then.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sdedovic sdedovic Mar 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I disagree. I don't know why the tests fail. I don't know if they only fail on my x86_linux or if they fail on other architectures (aarch64) and other OSs (darwin). So I don't want to maintain the check phase being dependent on the tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants